The It Ends With Us authorized battle continues — however this time it’s between star Blake Energetic and a Texas disaster communications specialist and his firm, Road Relations.
Jed Wallace and Road Relations are suing the actor for defamation after Energetic allegedly pulled them into her authorized battle with co-star and director Justin Baldoni over the movie.
Wallace filed a $7-million lawsuit in federal court docket in Texas on Tuesday, stating that he had nothing to do with any marketing campaign to hurt Energetic’s popularity as she alleged in a court docket submitting from December 2024. He’s additionally looking for a court docket order stating that he didn’t interact in harassment or retaliation towards Energetic.
This got here after the Gossip Woman actor filed a petition on Jan. 21 looking for a deposition from Wallace, who Energetic alleges was utilized by publicists working with Baldoni to weaponize “a digital military across the nation, together with in New York and Los Angeles, to create, seed, manipulate, and advance disparaging content material that gave the impression to be genuine on social media platforms and web chat boards.” In response to The Hollywood Reporter, Energetic’s petition looking for a court docket order to depose Wallace was dropped on Tuesday.
Wallace will not be among the many defendants in Energetic’s federal lawsuit towards Baldoni, his manufacturing firm and publicists, wherein she alleges sexual and different harassment in the course of the manufacturing and a marketing campaign to smear her after it. The disaster specialist is known as within the court docket papers and the New York Occasions story printed on the day the collection of authorized battles started in December, when Energetic filed a grievance.
Wallace’s 10-page lawsuit says neither he nor Road Relations “had something to do with the alleged sexual harassment, retaliation, failure to analyze or aiding and abetting the alleged harassment or alleged retaliation,” based on court docket paperwork. (International Information has not independently considered the paperwork.)
“The statements of reality, precise or implied, of and regarding Plaintiffs within the Precursor and CRD Criticism are false, defamatory, made with both negligence or ‘precise malice’ and have precipitated tens of millions of {dollars} in reputational hurt together with each common and particular damages via emotional hurt (Wallace), precise damages and actual and projected lack of enterprise (Wallace and Road) in an quantity that exceeds $1,000,000,” Wallace’s submitting learn.
“As Energetic later admitted she knew of no details to assist the allegations,” Charles Babcock, a lawyer for Wallace, wrote within the grievance. “Neither Wallace nor Road had something to do with the alleged sexual harassment, retaliation, failure to analyze or aiding and abetting the alleged harassment or alleged retaliation. Neither might they’ve breached a contract with Energetic as a result of no such contract exists.”
Get breaking Nationwide information
For information impacting Canada and around the globe, join breaking information alerts delivered on to you once they occur.
In response to the lawsuit, Energetic’s authorized crew mentioned, “One other day, one other state, one other nine-figure lawsuit looking for to sue Ms. Energetic ‘into oblivion’ for talking out towards sexual harassment and retaliation.”
“This isn’t only a publicity stunt — it’s clear retaliation in response to allegations contained inside a sexual harassment and retaliation grievance that Ms. Energetic filed with the California Civil Rights Division,” her attorneys added of their assertion to media. “Whereas this lawsuit will probably be dismissed, we’re happy that Mr. Wallace has lastly emerged from the shadows, and that he too will probably be held accountable in federal court docket.”
Wallace’s lawyer Babcock launched an announcement in response to Energetic’s authorized crew. He referred to Wallace as “a really personal individual, who has by no means met or spoken to Ms. Energetic. Ever.”
“He has not engaged in a smear marketing campaign towards her at any time limit. The choice to file this lawsuit to rightfully shield himself and his household was made after Ms. Energetic not solely filed towards him first in Texas however, indicated she supposed to call him in yet one more lawsuit,” Babcock mentioned.
The continuing authorized battle between the It Ends With Us co-stars started after Energetic sued Baldoni and he filed his personal federal lawsuit towards her and her husband, Deadpool star Ryan Reynolds, accusing them of defamation and extortion and looking for not less than $400 million in damages.
Baldoni had already sued the New York Occasions for libel, and his former publicist filed a lawsuit taking Energetic’s aspect.
Energetic and Baldoni’s case headed to court docket on Feb. 3 as Energetic’s authorized crew started to debate a possible gag order.
On Feb. 3, a U.S. decide admonished attorneys for Baldoni and Energetic to not publicly focus on the actors’ competing civil lawsuits. Energetic’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb complained to U.S. District Decide Lewis Liman at a listening to in Manhattan federal court docket that Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman violated skilled ethics guidelines for attorneys by accusing Energetic of “bullying.”
“It’s very exhausting to un-ring the bell,” Gottlieb mentioned, arguing that such statements might taint the jury pool for the scheduled March 9, 2026 trial.
Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman instructed that his feedback to Individuals and in a podcast look have been a response to the Dec. 21 New York Occasions article that “fully devastated” Baldoni.
“This has not been a one-way avenue,” he mentioned.
Liman adopted a New York state rule barring most out-of-court statements that might have an effect on a case’s final result, with an exception for safeguarding a consumer from prejudicial adversarial publicity.
The decide might sanction attorneys for violations. Neither Gottlieb nor Freedman objected. Baldoni and Energetic weren’t in attendance on the listening to.
Energetic’s attorneys Gottlieb and Esra Hudson mentioned in an announcement, “We’re happy with the results of in the present day’s listening to and keen to maneuver ahead instantly with discovery on this case.”
“The court docket granted our request that every one attorneys within the matter really comply with the rule of regulation and never make any statements that might prejudice a jury,” they continued. “This case offers with severe allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation. We are going to maintain the defendants accountable, and we’re assured that after all of the proof is submitted on this matter, Ms. Energetic will prevail.”
Freedman mentioned, “I couldn’t be extra happy with how the case was dealt with in the present day. We’re going to maneuver as rapidly as doable and show our innocence.”
It Ends With Us, an adaptation of Colleen Hoover’s bestselling 2016 novel that begins as a romance however takes a darkish flip into home violence, was launched in August 2024, exceeding field workplace expectations with a home whole of practically $150 million. The success was adopted by near-constant turmoil over its manufacturing and promotion.
—With recordsdata from The Related Press
© 2025 International Information, a division of Corus Leisure Inc.
