Justin Baldoni has shared extra textual content messages he says are from his It Ends With Us co-star Blake Full of life and her husband, Ryan Reynolds.
The textual content messages had been launched on a web site, titled The Lawsuit Data, created to assist defend himself in opposition to Full of life’s sexual harassment allegations.
On the brand new web site, printed on Sunday, Baldoni, 41, additionally shared an amended grievance in his case in opposition to Full of life, Reynolds, Full of life’s PR agency and the New York Instances, in addition to a 168-page doc entitled “Timeline of related occasions” associated to the case and the manufacturing of the movie.
Baldoni sued his co-star Full of life, 37, and her husband, Reynolds, 48, for defamation earlier this month. Baldoni’s go well with seeks no less than US$400 million in damages that embody misplaced future revenue. That lawsuit got here the identical day that Baldoni sued the New York Instances for libel, alleging the paper labored with Full of life to smear him.
The timeline contains emails and textual content messages that had been allegedly despatched main as much as and throughout the filming of the film. Lots of the textual content messages have been beforehand shared in court docket paperwork, however a few of them are new.
“Lemme know what you like 🙂 when you knew me (in individual) longer you’d have a way of how flirty and yummy the ball busting would play. It’s my love language. Spicy and playfully daring, by no means with enamel,” the textual content continued. “And him serving it again to her is simply as necessary. You don’t often see each the person AND the lady with such company and humor. Anyway, I can act it out for you subsequent week to ensure it comes via. Or I can ship now. Lemme know what you like. Xx.”
Baldoni’s staff additionally uploaded screenshots of textual content messages that they allege are between the Jane The Virgin actor and Reynolds.
The texts are dated February 2023 and present Baldoni introducing himself to Reynolds. The Deadpool star responds with a message about his pleasure for It Ends With Us.
“I’m excited so that you can work collectively,” Reynolds allegedly wrote. “I’m excited for Blake to crack open her inventive piggy financial institution with somebody as dynamic as you. That is gonna be INCREDIBLE… I occur to adore you, Justin.”
Baldoni additionally claims that Full of life and Reynolds ready an announcement for him and his agency, asking him to take the blame for the “troubled manufacturing” of the movie and the destructive press Full of life obtained whereas selling it. Baldoni and his staff declare they refused to problem the assertion supplied by the couple.
The assertion was allegedly written in August 2024 by Full of life and Reynolds after they claimed that Baldoni was allowed to debate “extra severe messaging” whereas selling the movie.
The assertion reads, “It Ends with Us was a troubled manufacturing which we take full accountability for. We’re very sorry to everybody we triggered upset to privately and publicly.”
“Blake Full of life, Katie Scott Colleen Hoover, your entire forged and crew led with professionalism each step of the best way, any negativity aimed toward them is ours to personal,” the assertion continued. “We mutually agreed that the forged can be selling the movie individually and understood why.
“We’ve all the time stated we’re not excellent and even when unintentionally make errors, we’ll all the time personal them. We maintain ourselves accountable, it’s not anybody’s job however ours and that’s a part of being ‘man sufficient.’ We’ll observe what we preach. We’re studying and rising from the expertise and we thank everybody for his or her endurance as we discover a higher option to proceed.”
After the web site was printed, Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman launched an announcement to the press, saying, “The choice to amend our lawsuit was a logical subsequent step as a result of overwhelming quantity of latest proof that has come to mild. This contemporary proof corroborates what we knew all alongside, that because of purely egotistical causes Ms. Full of life and her whole staff colluded for months to destroy reputations via a posh net of lies, false accusations and the manipulation of illicitly obtained communications.”
Get every day Nationwide information
Get the day’s prime information, political, financial, and present affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox as soon as a day.
“The continued public curiosity on this case on-line has mockingly make clear the simple info pertaining to The New York Instances and the way closely Ms. Full of life and her representatives weren’t solely deeply concerned within the tried take down and smear marketing campaign of Mr. Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and their groups however that they themselves initiated it,” Freedman added.
Textual content messages between Full of life and Baldoni, the place she seemingly alludes to Taylor Swift as “considered one of her dragons,” had been launched earlier this month. Swift and Full of life have been very shut pals since 2015 and the pop star is the godmother of Full of life’s youngsters.
(Swift shouldn’t be named as a defendant in Baldoni’s new go well with and her identify shouldn’t be talked about within the submitting. There’s solely a reference to “Taylor” in a textual content message between the 2 co-stars.)
Within the textual content messages between the pair, Baldoni goes into element concerning the rooftop scene within the film that Full of life had allegedly reworked. His legal professionals declare that the actor “felt obliged to textual content Full of life to say that he had favored her pages and hadn’t wanted Reynolds and her megacelebrity good friend to stress him.”
In keeping with the go well with, Full of life invited Baldoni to her penthouse in New York, the place Reynolds and a “megacelebrity good friend” each praised Full of life’s model of the rooftop scene.
“Additionally was engaged on rooftop scene immediately, I actually love what you probably did. It actually does hep loads,” Baldoni wrote within the textual content message. “Makes it a lot extra enjoyable and fascinating. (And I’d have felt that method with out Ryan and Taylor). You actually are a expertise throughout the board. Actually excited nd [sic] grateful to do that collectively.”
In a textual content from Full of life, based on the go well with, she calls Reynolds and one other individual, whose identify is redacted, “absolute titans as writers and storytellers outdoors of their main gig.”
“Additionally they know I’m not all the time pretty much as good at ensuring I’m seen and utilized for worry of threatening egos, or worry of affecting the convenience of the method. They don’t give a sh*t about that. And due to that, everybody listens to them with immense respect and enthusiasm. So I assume I’ve to cease worrying about individuals liking me,” Full of life allegedly wrote.
Full of life goes on to check herself to Khaleesi, a Sport of Thrones character performed by Emilia Clarke.
“Should you ever get round to watching Sport of Thrones, you’ll recognize that I’m Khaleesi, and like her, I occur to have a number of dragons. For higher or worse, however often for higher. As a result of my dragons additionally shield these I battle for. So actually all of us profit from these beautiful monsters of mine. You’ll too, I can promise you,” Full of life wrote.
Full of life and Baldoni’s case headed to court docket on Feb. 3 because the Gossip Woman actor’s authorized staff started to debate a possible gag order.
On Monday, a U.S. decide admonished legal professionals for Baldoni and Full of life to not publicly talk about the actors’ competing civil lawsuits.
Full of life’s lawyer Michael Gottlieb complained to U.S. District Choose Lewis Liman at a listening to in Manhattan federal court docket that Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman violated skilled ethics guidelines for legal professionals by accusing Full of life of “bullying.”
“It’s very exhausting to un-ring the bell,” Gottlieb stated, arguing that such statements might taint the jury pool for the scheduled March 2026 trial.
Freedman advised that his feedback to Folks journal and in a podcast look had been a response to the Dec. 21 New York Instances article that “utterly devastated” Baldoni.
“This has not been a one-way avenue,” he stated.
Liman adopted a New York state rule barring most out-of-court statements that would have an effect on a case’s end result, with an exception for shielding a shopper from prejudicial antagonistic publicity.
The decide might sanction legal professionals for violations. Neither Gottlieb nor Freedman objected. Baldoni and Full of life weren’t in attendance at Monday’s listening to.
Full of life’s legal professionals Gottlieb and Esra Hudson stated in an announcement, “We’re happy with the results of immediately’s listening to and keen to maneuver ahead instantly with discovery on this case.”
“The court docket granted our request that each one attorneys within the matter truly comply with the rule of regulation and never make any statements that would prejudice a jury,” they continued. “This case offers with severe allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation. We’ll maintain the defendants accountable, and we’re assured that when all of the proof is submitted on this matter, Ms. Full of life will prevail.”
In keeping with The Hollywood Reporter, Freedman stated, “I couldn’t be extra happy with how the case was dealt with immediately. We’re going to maneuver as shortly as attainable and show our innocence.”
On Jan. 21, the identical day Baldoni’s authorized staff launched uncooked, unedited footage from the movie following Full of life’s sexual harassment claims, Full of life and Reynolds’ legal professionals issued a letter to New York federal decide Lewis J. Liman looking for a gag order for Baldoni’s lawyer, Freedman.
In keeping with paperwork obtained by a number of leisure publications, Full of life’s authorized staff alleged that “just about day by day” since she filed her lawsuit in opposition to Baldoni, “Mr. Freedman has given tv interviews, appeared on podcasts, issued inflammatory written statements, and leaked data (together with, remarkably, paperwork as banal as doc preservation calls for to 3rd events) to the Hollywood press and tabloid media.”
The couple’s legal professionals additionally alleged that most of the public statements made by Freedman, “not solely proceed the marketing campaign of retaliation that was the topic of Ms. Full of life’s First Stop and Desist, however they include quite a few new false statements about Ms. Full of life and others.”
International Information has not independently considered the authorized paperwork.
In an announcement to International Information on Jan. 22, Freedman stated his staff launched the footage as a result of “Baldoni workouts his proper to publicly defend himself by placing forth precise info and proof.”
“Previous to submitting her lawsuit in court docket, Ms. Full of life went to The New York Instances in an effort to publicly destroy Justin Baldoni. When Mr. Baldoni workouts his proper to publicly defend himself by placing forth precise info and proof, for Ms. Full of life and staff this immediately turns into morally and ethically mistaken,” the assertion learn.
“Ms. Full of life desires very totally different requirements to use to her however fortuitously, fact and authenticity apply to everybody and might by no means be mistaken. Wanting on the video and the proof to come back, I can perceive why Ms. Full of life would now, not need this to play out in public.”
On Jan. 27, Choose Liman set a March 9, 2026 trial date and moved an preliminary convention from mid-February to this week as the general public feud between Full of life and Baldoni continues to develop. He advised legal professionals to be ready to handle complaints about pretrial publicity and lawyer conduct.
Full of life and Reynolds haven’t responded publicly to the web site as of this writing.
—With information from International Information’ Michelle Butterfield, Reuters and The Related Press
